Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
The Medical Journal of Malaysia ; : 154-162, 2018.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-732558

ABSTRACT

mortality and an important cause of morbidity in Malaysiafor several years. To reduce global cardiovascular (CV) riskin the population, primary preventive strategies need to beimplemented. Hypercholesterolaemia is one of the majorrisk factors for CVD. This paper is an expert review on themanagement of hypercholesterolemia focusing on high andvery high risk individuals. In low and Intermediate riskindividuals, therapeutic lifestyle changes (TLC) and ahealthy lifestyle alone may suffice. In high and very high riskindividuals, drug therapy in conjunction with TLC arenecessary to achieve the target LDL-C levels which havebeen shown to slow down progression and sometimes evenresult in regression of atherosclerotic plaques. Statins arefirst-line drugs because they have been shown in numerousrandomized controlled trials to be effective in reducing CVevents and to be safe. In some high risk individuals, despitemaximally tolerated statin therapy, target Low DensityLipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are not achieved.These include those with familial hypercholesterolaemia andstatin intolerance. This paper discusses non-statintherapies, such as ezetimibe and the newer Proproteinconvertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 Inhibitors (PCSK9-i).

2.
Singapore medical journal ; : 191-197, 2016.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-276718

ABSTRACT

<p><b>INTRODUCTION</b>The elderly are often underrepresented in clinical trials for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and cardiologists commonly face management dilemmas in the choice of treatment for this group of patients, particularly concerning the use of invasive revascularisation. This study analysed the characteristics of hospitalised elderly patients with ACS, and compared the outcomes of treatments.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From 29 December 2005 to 26 April 2010, 13,545 patients were admitted for ACS in 16 hospitals across Malaysia. These patients were divided into two groups - elderly (≥ 65 years) and non-elderly (< 65 years). The clinical characteristics, treatment received (invasive or non-invasive) and outcomes (in-hospital and 30-day all-cause mortality) of the two groups were compared. The elderly patients were then grouped according to the type of treatment received, and the outcomes of the two subgroups were compared.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Elderly patients had a higher cardiovascular risk burden and a higher incidence of comorbidities. They were less likely to receive urgent revascularisation for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (elderly: 73.9% vs. non-elderly: 81.4%) and had longer door-to-needle time (elderly: 60 minutes vs. non-elderly: 50 minutes, p = 0.004). The rate of cardiac catheterisation was significantly lower in the elderly group across all ACS strata. Elderly patients had poorer outcomes than non-elderly patients, but those who received invasive treatment appeared to have better outcomes than those who received non-invasive treatment.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Elderly patients with ACS tend to be undertreated, both invasively and pharmacologically. Invasive treatment seems to yield better outcomes for this group of patients.</p>


Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Acute Coronary Syndrome , Epidemiology , Age Factors , Cardiovascular Diseases , Epidemiology , Databases, Factual , Malaysia , Epidemiology , Morbidity , Registries , Survival Rate
3.
Annals of Saudi Medicine. 2012; 32 (4): 433-436
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-132150

ABSTRACT

Massive pulmonary embolism [PE] is not an uncommon condition, and it usually carries a high risk of mortality. It is one of the fatal conditions that commonly affect young patients. A definitive treatment for patients with massive PE is still lacking, and surgical intervention carries a substantial mortality risk. Thus, percutaneous intervention [clot fragmentation and/or aspiration] remains an option in some patients, specifically in those with a risk of bleeding, contraindicating the use of thrombolysis. There have been no randomized trials to validate percutaneous intervention in massive PE. A sufficient level of evidence is still lacking, and its use depends upon the expert committee's opinion and study of previous case reports. We present a 23-year-old man with first onset massive PE secondary to protein C deficiency, who was treated successfully with the combination of systemic thrombolysis and percutaneous interventions

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL